🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations worked, and disclosed new appeals had been made by intermediaries to resume talks with the US government. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Path

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult path since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with the American leader asserting the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries used their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations resume.

Trump last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts diplomacy is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his speech to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be settled by military means. He stated the strikes commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and concluded with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly sought to dictate their demands during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be alive and remains the primary resolution to address disagreements, but its requirements, rules and principles must be followed."

"If they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We acquired many lessons from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He stated: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this assault."